THE LAST WITNESS

The 2009 Case

Some files are sealed for legal reasons. Some are sealed for reasons that look legal but are something else.

Raymond Doss || 2009 || Research || Discovery

The Chicago Public Library’s Harold Washington branch on South State Street opened at nine on Friday mornings, and Sara was there at 9:05 a.m. with her coat and her notebook and the specific purposefulness of someone who had not slept and was substituting determination for rest, which was a trade she had made many times across seven years of demanding work and which had never failed her yet. She found a table in the research section, away from the main floor, and she set up her laptop and she opened the newspaper archives and she began to search. Raymond Doss. The 2009 murder case. The conviction. The appeal. Thomas Greer’s investigation. She approached it the way she approached a prosecution she was building from scratch — not from conclusion backward, but from facts forward, assembling the chronology in the order it happened rather than the order she was interested in.

The victim in the 2009 case was a man named Calvin Marsh, fifty-three, found shot in the parking lot of a restaurant in Bridgeport on a Thursday night in March. The restaurant was called Delilah’s, which Sara recognized as a southside institution that had been operating since the seventies — the kind of place that had regulars and history and the specific character of a neighborhood establishment. Calvin Marsh was described in the initial reporting as a retired union official, a father of two, a longtime Bridgeport resident. He had been shot twice — once in the chest, once in the head, the second shot at close range in what investigators described as an execution-style finish, the kind of professional deliberateness that moved a shooting from an altercation to a murder committed by someone who had done this before. The gun was recovered from a dumpster three blocks away. It had been wiped but not thoroughly — there were partial prints. The prints matched Raymond Doss. Doss was twenty-eight years old in 2009, a former employee at Calvin Marsh’s union, fired for what the prosecution described as theft and what Doss’s defense described as a dispute over wages. He had a prior conviction — one count of assault, from 2005, which had resulted in a year of probation. He had motive (the employment dispute, which had apparently been acrimonious), opportunity (no confirmed alibi for the night of the shooting), and physical evidence (the prints on the gun). He was arrested in April 2009, tried in September 2009, and convicted by a jury in October after deliberating for two days. Sentenced to twenty-five to life. He had been in Stateville Correctional Center in Crest Hill ever since — fifteen years, and then some.

The name Sara Cole appeared in the records as the assistant prosecutor in the case. Not the lead — the lead was an ADA named Harold Beck, who had since retired and who Sara knew by reputation as a thorough, unspectacular prosecutor of the old school. Sara Cole was listed as second chair. She would have been twenty-four years old in 2009. She would have been in her second year of law school. She was at Northwestern Law from 2008 to 2011. She was not, could not have been, licensed to practice law. She was not, could not have been, an ADA. The records were wrong, or the records had been altered, or there was a Sara Cole she did not know about and who had her name. She stared at the screen and methodically examined all three possibilities. Wrong: possible, records had errors, but institutional court records of a murder trial were the kind of records that multiple parties had interest in maintaining accurately. Altered: more complex, requiring access to archived court records, not impossible but involving significant risk and specific capability. Third Sara Cole: she ran a search for other Sara Coles in the Chicago legal community, cross-referenced by the period. She found two. One was a family law attorney in Naperville who had graduated from DePaul Law in 2004 and whose photograph was a white woman with blonde hair who looked nothing like Sara. One was a paralegal who worked in the Seventh Circuit’s clerk’s office. Neither was her. She was back to wrong or altered. She preferred altered. She preferred it not because it was more comfortable — it wasn’t, at all — but because it was more useful. Altered meant someone had done it. Altered meant there was a why and a how and a who. Altered was a problem she could work on. Wrong was a dead end. She clicked through to Thomas Greer’s articles. She found the 2011 Tribune piece, which she had already read. She found others. He had been working the Doss case seriously — there were three subsequent pieces, each going deeper, each adding detail that the mainstream coverage had missed or glossed. In a 2013 feature for a longform magazine, Greer had written a 6,000-word investigation arguing that the key evidence — the partial prints on the gun — had been tested in a manner inconsistent with established procedure. That the chain of custody for the weapon had a documented gap of four hours between recovery and evidence logging. That the prosecution’s star witness, a man named Eddie Crane who had placed Doss at the scene, had a prior relationship with a senior figure in the Chicago Police Department that had not been disclosed to the defense. That Raymond Doss had maintained, throughout trial and through fifteen years of incarceration, that he did not know Calvin Marsh was going to be at Delilah’s that night, that he had been elsewhere, that his alibi — three people who said they were with him — had been discredited through what he alleged was a coordinated campaign of pressure and discreditation. Greer had not been able to prove any of this definitively. But the pattern he had identified was clear to Sara’s trained eye: this had the shape of a frame. Not a clumsy one — a sophisticated one, the kind that was constructed by people who understood the criminal justice system well enough to use it as a weapon.

She sat back. She looked at the ceiling of the Harold Washington library. Around her, the Friday morning research section was filling up — retirees, students, a young woman with a sleeping infant, a man in a heavy coat making notes from a stack of journals. Ordinary life proceeding at the pace of an ordinary Friday. Sara lived in a different version of the same Friday. She took out her notebook. She wrote three column headers at the top of a fresh page: WHO, WHAT, WHY. Under WHO: someone who had access to court records and the ability to alter them. Someone who had constructed a frame conviction in 2009. Someone who had reason to suppress Thomas Greer’s investigation. Someone who had access to Sara’s phone or her phone records and the ability to place calls from her number. Under WHAT: a murder conviction that was a lie. A journalist put in a coma. A memory gap in a witness. A name planted in records. Under WHY: the most important column and the emptiest one. She wrote one entry under WHY and underlined it twice: Raymond Doss knew something, or knows something, or someone is afraid he will know something he doesn’t know yet. She thought about the voice on the phone: The right person to go to prison for 2009 and 2024 and everything in between. The person who put Doss in prison was still free. Was still active. Had put Thomas Greer in a hospital. Had done something to Sara — something she didn’t remember — that had put her in the position of the witness at the scene, which was either a coincidence or an arrangement. She thought about the word arranged. She did not believe in coincidence. She believed in evidence. What the evidence was suggesting was enormous and implicated people with significant power and she was not yet ready to name anyone specifically without more. But she had a direction. She had Raymond Doss’s name. She had the 2009 case. She had Thomas Greer’s journalism, which was not finished being useful just because Greer was in a coma. She closed her laptop. She walked out into the Friday morning. She got in her car. She drove, not to the office, but south. Toward Stateville. She was going to talk to Raymond Doss.



Leave a Comment